Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 12:52
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Kirk Cousins spoke to the media — Here are 5 things we learned - Atlanta Falcons
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Moving sucks, but decluttering helps - The Verge
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What was your most memorable experience catching a fraudulent car seller?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What are some very specific groups of people you just cannot stand?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Pokémon developer Game Freak reveals Beast of Reincarnation at Xbox Games Showcase - Eurogamer